, previously been covered by the machinist union. but they added jobs there. and this was considered to be retaliation rather than good business sense to have two locations making the dreamliner. >> i had two quick questions on this. i'm so interested in this board and their judges. apparently one of the deputy consuls or something e-mails one of the members or somebody and said that she was worried that they might have made the machinist union angry or mad. that's absolutely incredible. that's in the reporting here, which i guess proves your point. but that's just total bias. >> obviously, if you're so concerned that you don't even want the union leadership to be "angry" at you, that shows you're trying to play favorites for the union. remember, this was a suit that as soon as the union settled a new contract with boeing, they made this go away when, in fact, if it was wrong conduct -- misconduct on behalf of boeing, it should have continued. but in fact, this was used as a technique to get the machinist union a new contract that th